Imagine a world where you're never out of power. In an era when our lives depend on electronic devices and appliances, having a reliable backup power option, whether you're at home or on the go, is absolutely critical.
The good news is that no matter where you are, what you're doing, or what the weather is like, you can always rely on a portable power station to keep your devices charged and running.
Two of the most popular portable power stations on the market today are the Anker 767 PowerHouse (also known as the SOLIX F2000) and the BLUETTI AC200MAX. Both power stations offer a wide range of features and benefits, but which one is right for you?
In this review, we'll compare the Anker 767 and the BLUETTI AC200Max side-by-side, examining everything from their capacity and charging speed to their portability and features. By the end of this review, you'll have a clear understanding of which power station is the best fit for your needs.
We compare the Anker 767/SOLIX F2000 with the BLUETTI AC200MAX using the following criteria:
- Price
- Capacity
- Durability
- Expandability
- Portability
- Charging Options
- Special Features
- Noise Level
Let's get started!
1. Price Point
Let's just get the big question out of the way first. How much do they cost?
| |
Anker 767/SOLIX F2000 |
BLUETTI AC200MAX |
| MSRP (2023) |
$1,999.00 USD |
$1,959.00 USD |
Winner: BLUETTI AC200MAX
If you're looking purely for the lowest-cost option, the BLUETTI AC200MAX is the winner. However, the price of each device is so close that it's almost a non-factor. Furthermore, these products can often be found on sale, with one being less expensive than the other at any given time.
More important than price are some of the following factors.
2. Capacity and Performance
| |
Anker 767/SOLIX F2000 |
BLUETTI AC200MAX |
| Battery Capacity |
2,048Wh |
2,204Wh |
| Max AC Output |
2,400W |
2,200W |
| Max Solar Input |
1000W |
900W max |
| Battery Type |
LFP |
LFP |
| Inverter Type |
Pure Sine Wave |
Pure Sine Wave |
| Total Charging Ports |
12 |
14 |
| AC Ports |
4 |
4 |
| USB-A Ports |
2 |
4 |
| USB-C Ports |
3 |
1 |
| 12V Car Ports |
2 |
1 |
30A RV Port
|
1 |
1 |
| 12V DC Port |
0 |
2 |
| Wireless Charging Pad |
0 |
2 |
Winner: BLUETTI AC200MAX
The AC200MAX keeps the lead with its somewhat higher capacity and output options, even as its output power is slightly less.
3. Durability and Build Quality
| |
Anker 767/SOLIX F2000 |
BLUETTI AC200MAX |
| Outer Shell |
Durable ABS plastic shell |
Rugged aluminum alloy shell |
| Weather Resistance |
IPX3 weather resistance |
IP54-rated for
water and dust resistance |
Winner: BLUETTI AC200MAX
The BLUETTI wins in terms of durability, thanks to its robust build and higher IP rating, which makes it more resilient to harsh environmental conditions.
4. Expandability
| |
Anker 767/SOLIX F2000 |
BLUETTI AC200MAX |
| Expandable Capacity |
Expands to 4,096 Wh with
1 760 expansion battery |
Expands up to 8,192Wh with
2 B300 expansion batteries |
Winner: The BLUETTI AC200MAX
The AC200MAX offers more flexibility for expansion, allowing you to harness more solar power.
5. Portability
| |
Anker 767/SOLIX F2000 |
BLUETTI AC200MAX |
| Weight |
67.2 lb. / 30.5 kg |
61.9 lb. / 28.1 kg |
| Portability Assistance |
Handle & wheels |
Handle, no wheels |
| Dimensions |
20.7 x 15.5 x 9.8 in
52.5 x 39.5 x 25.0 cm |
16.5 x 11 x 15.2 in
42 x 28 x 38.65 cm |
Winner: The Anker 767/SOLIX F2000
The Anker 767 wins in terms of portability. Even though it is a bit heavier and larger in size, the addition of wheels makes carting it around far more convenient for on-the-go use than the AC200MAX.
6. Charging Options
| |
Anker 767/SOLIX F2000 |
BLUETTI AC200MAX |
| AC Wall Charger |
Yes, included (1.9 hours) |
Yes, included (5.5-6 hours) |
| 12V Car Charger |
Yes, included (19.6 hours) |
Yes, included (10-20 hours) |
| Solar Panels |
Yes sold separately
(2.5 hours w/1000W max input) |
Yes sold separately
(3-3.5 hours w/900w max) |
Winner: Anker 767
The Anker 767 wins this one easily. They have the same charging options, but the Anker can be recharged significantly faster.
7. Special Features
| |
Anker 767/SOLIX F2000 |
BLUETTI AC200MAX |
| Smartphone App |
Yes |
Yes |
| Supports Wi-Fi |
No |
No |
| Supports Bluetooth |
Yes |
Yes |
Winner: Tie
We have a tie, folks. Both power stations have a smartphone application that can monitor and control some functionality of the units via Bluetooth, but not Wi-Fi.
8. Noise Level
| |
Anker 767/SOLIX F2000 |
BLUETTI AC200MAX |
| Decibels |
Approximately 50dB |
Approximately 60dB |
Winner: Anker 767
While neither one is that loud, the Anker 767 PowerHouse is the quieter option, making it more suitable for quiet environments.
Anker 767 vs. BLUETTI AC200MAX: Which is better?
In the showdown between the Anker 767 PowerHouse and the BLUETTI AC200MAX, your choice ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. Here's a quick recap to help you make an informed decision:
If budget is a primary concern: The BLUETTI AC200MAX is the more economical choice, providing a balance between capacity and affordability.
If power capacity is crucial: The BLUETTI AC200MAX take a slight edge over the Anker 767, and it has great output flexibility.
If durability and expandability matter: The BLUETTI AC200MAX's robust build make it a winner for withstanding rugged conditions and weather conditions.
If portability and quiet operation are essential: The Anker 767 PowerHouse is the more portable and quieter option, making it better suited for on-the-go and noise-sensitive situations.
Ultimately, both power stations offer reliable portable power solutions, but the BLUETTI AC200MAX shines in terms of capacity and durability, while the Anker 767 PowerHouse excels in portability. Assess your specific needs, and let this comparison guide you toward the portable power station that best suits your off-grid lifestyle. Make an informed choice, and enjoy the freedom of reliable, portable power wherever you go.
